Public Question #1
Yes
No
Currently, under the Constitution of the State of Indiana, a person charged with murder or treason is not entitled to be released on bail if the proof is evident or the presumption strong. Shall the Constitution of the State of Indiana be amended to provide that a person charged with an offense other than murder or treason is not entitled to bail if: (1) the proof is evident or the presumption strong; and (2) the state proves by clear and convincing evidence that no release conditions will reasonably protect the safety of any other person or the community. (This question concerns Article 1, Section 17 of the Constitution of the State of Indiana.)
Hendricks County Prosecutor, Loren Delp, argues in favor of a vote "yes" , stating "It would give judges a very limited tool for exceptional cases. A tool governed by a demanding burden of proof, procedural safeguards, judicial findings, and strict time limits... to protect victims and the public when clear and convincing evidence shows nothing else will work."
The Indiana ACLU argues in favor of a vote "no" , stating that ratification, "Would allow someone's freedom to sit in the hands of a single judge, raising prominent concerns about due process rights, bias, inconsistency, and inequity on the decision of who gets to go home and who stays behind bars."
Public Question #2
Yes
No
Shall the Constitution of the State of Indiana be amended to permit the judge of a city or town court to reside in: (1) the county in which the court is located; or (2) the bordering county closest to the city or town in which the court is located? (This question concerns Article 6, Section 6 of the Constitution of the State of Indiana.)
The Indiana Lawyer argues in favor of a vote "yes" , stating that rural Indiana faces issues recruiting qualified attorneys to serve as judges. By widening the eligibility pool to the broader county or closest adjacent county, a vote "yes" would reduce bottlenecks, prevent cases from facing indefinite suspension, and preserve a regional connection between the judge and the community.
No formal advocacy groups, committees, or public figures have registered arguments or launched campaigns against the amendment on Ballotpedia . And the amendment passed the Indiana General Assembly with overwhelming bipartisan support (90–0 in the House, 48–0 in the Senate).
Notes: